- TOPAZ VIDEO ENHANCE AI PROMO CODE HOW TO
- TOPAZ VIDEO ENHANCE AI PROMO CODE 1080P
- TOPAZ VIDEO ENHANCE AI PROMO CODE MANUALS
- TOPAZ VIDEO ENHANCE AI PROMO CODE TRIAL
Again, you don't know what you don't know, and don't realize the stupidity of that question.ĭo you realize how that response sounds like?
TOPAZ VIDEO ENHANCE AI PROMO CODE HOW TO
This is a task-based exercise, and generic "teach me how to use Avisynth to upscale/restore" is one of those questions that shouldn't even be asked. But again, the main aspect is starting with samples. I've had gripes about Avisynth documentation for years.
TOPAZ VIDEO ENHANCE AI PROMO CODE MANUALS
The issue comes when the manuals are unclear to newcomers. They said they couldn't figure out the manuals and people on forums told them to read the manuals. After I post the comparisons, I'm fully ready to try different scripts in order to get better and better results.
TOPAZ VIDEO ENHANCE AI PROMO CODE 1080P
At the moment, I'm testing on 1080p to 4K and as asked for by some in the thread, I'll provide picture proof of output differences. However, despite my ongoing tests, I haven't been able to replicate it. I would not use VEAI if I got concrete proof that I can get at least the same quality with more efficiency using Avisynth. I guess the main question is, do you want people to use Avisynth, or do you just enjoy having superior skills? If someone actually just cannot figure out Avisynth and fires up Topaz VEAI, is that a bad thing?
TOPAZ VIDEO ENHANCE AI PROMO CODE TRIAL
At least I learn very well with trial and error and even that requires that I get some process running. I myself have now taught some people how to use Avisynth. However, being so closed off means that new people will have hard time learning and fitting in. I do get that communities need to gatekeep somewhat in order to keep away those who only want to leech. "You expect me to do everything for you? Educate yourself." "Could you show me how to get better, then?" "You only like it because you don't know any better." "Hey, I have noticed that people don't like X. However, the way it's used is archaic and the community hasn't been very welcoming. It's fast when you get it going and very customizable. Many rare video artifacts can be solved pretty nicely with Avisynth. You say that people want you to cook them a steak, when they haven't cooked before and are now genuinely asking "can a steak be cooked using that method?" I personally have now learned to use Avisynth and it has a lot of good uses. It sounds like you don't want to consider a different way to approach problems, even when it's been demonstrated that people have used VEAI for great effect. The quality of Video Enhance AI is not something you can just brush aside like that. Can you imagine somebody claiming that Alpo tastes great, and he/she doesn't understand why you hate it so much? When all you've ever eaten is dog food, you are unaware of what a steak or hamburger tastes like. You can choose to learn better method, or you can continue to live in a Topaz bubble. Nobody here is going to do A/B testing to "prove" anything to you. When you start your own project, or A/B comparison project, and have questions (and samples!), then come back and post those. You've been given lots of info here already. To return to my earlier analogy, this is not going to work on me: "I don't believe you that Alpo is bad because you won't cook me a steak". Hybrid also has filters included, for the newbies, or just for convenience (as I use it more and more for ease). avs file, open in VirtualDub or Hybrid to encode. AvsPmod, again both x86 and 圆4, help with preview script actions. Some filters only work in one, some in both. I consider x86 official and 圆4+ best, and realize that 86 and 64 act different. Avisynth is a bit spread at times, but all the core stuff is at the official wiki. Many also attached elsewhere (here at VH, at the forums, Github, various Doom9 user 3rd-party accounts, etc). The basic scripting for Avisynth is already shown here, using rpow2.īeyond that, whatever filtering is used is content based. For me, such a discussion is a waste of time. Without samples, this is an academic discussion.
You must understand the each video is different, each restoration must be approached differently. So you cannot simply say "I want to upscale a video". Video restoration - which is what the non-upscale aspects of this are (deblock, sharpen, etc) - is very content based. Or method to produce a better result Again, you don't know what you don't know.
0 kommentar(er)
